I’ll occasionally come across the phrase, “I’m good at helping others but I can’t help myself.” I want to break this down a little bit and highlight a few concepts.
If we hold the first part of the phrase under a microscope, here’s how it looks: “I’m good at listening to a person’s situation, making an assessment of their available options, and then giving them advice about what they should do next.”
There is nothing wrong with that. That’s what some therapists do. And it helps some people. The downside is the frustration in the second part: that they “can’t help themselves.”
Here’s how the frustration looks under a microscope: “When I examine my own situation, I usually come up with advice for myself about what I should do. But then I run into some serious difficulty in following through with the plan. I can’t get myself to do what I should do.”
So let’s check this out.
It’s a problem of exploration, choice, and payoff – and ultimately, like everything else, energy flow. To put it another way, it’s an insight problem followed by a stalemate of energy and behavior.
Whenever we fully want to do something, we move into it with grace, ease, passion, interest, care, eagerness (and many other really positive sounding words).
Whenever we partially want to do something, the behavioral flow loses some of its power and force. The more partial it is, the harder it is to follow through with the task. If I partially want to get my paperwork done but I partially want to go to bed, it’s going to be pretty hard to get my paperwork done. If going to bed ends up trumping the paperwork (51% bed, 49% paperwork) then I’m going to bed. I might not be able to sleep because some of me still wants to have my paperwork done. Makes sense, right? It’s pretty straightforward: desires come in percentages. Some desires compete. The largest one wins. Unfortunately (in this culture – for most people – and arguably even due to the human condition) the times when we have a desire that has 100% fullness are rare. Desires spend most of their time in conflict with other ones.
There’s a big difference between a “should” and a “want.” A “should” is an encryption. It keeps you from knowing the exact number of the percentage of “want.” It conceals/hides the valuable data. That’s why we encrypt things… to conceal the actual data.
People become a lot sturdier and free-flowing once they explore their personalities, find the “shoulds,” and become hackers: unencrypting them and uncovering the valuable data of the actual percentages. Some “shoulds” become high-percentage-wants and they’re so much easier to flow with. Some “shoulds” become low-percentage-wants and they can be more easily disregarded. The tougher ones are when the percentages are close (like my bed-to-paperwork example). When the percentages are close, that’s where we’ll feel stuck because any movement will be the loss of a huge chunk of energy/desire. If I choose the 51% winner, that’s 49% of myself that’s not on board. That’s a big loss of fuel!
So let’s head back to the “I can’t help myself” example. Let’s also define “advice” as a “should.” When we ask someone for advice, we’re saying, “please assess my situation and tell me what I should do.” The sticking point ends up being a less-than-full evaluation of the wants. So whenever someone says, “I can’t help myself,” they’re saying, “I’ve assessed my situation and given myself advice (shoulds) but I can’t get myself to behaviorally follow it through.” This makes sense now, right? There are encryptions. The behaviors won’t flow unless there’s enough “want juice” flowing into it.
So here’s where it gets more complex because, if we want to rearrange the stalemate and create movement, we would need to develop the insight into functions.
Every whole wants to preserve itself – whether it’s a whole culture, a whole nation, a whole business, a whole pattern, a whole family, a whole creature, whatever. An animal will gnaw off its leg if it’s trapped and it can’t think of a better way to preserve the whole. Each human being is a whole. We seek to preserve ourselves. Every choice has a function of self-preservation.
So when we run into a problem where we can’t quite get ourselves to do what we think we should, we’re battling against a self-preservation desire that’s larger than the encrypted should. Rather than beat yourself up about why you’re not following through, it’s much healthier to try and move downwards into your personality and start to look for the payoffs to the choices. Give yourself more credit. At the roots of you, there’s a perfect reason why you’re doing what you’re doing. If you can’t quite see it yet, give yourself some time to fully examine your desires, your hopes, your fears. Try to move into the confusion/frustration (where the encryptions live) in order to map out those parts of you. They are obviously strong enough to influence you, so you might as well spend some time there. You might as well try to ally with those strengths rather than beat yourself up about not being able to overpower them. All the parts of you have vitality. All the parts of you are attempting to serve you for the greatest good. The goal is to tap into all of your vitality so you can move as one beautiful whole.
Once things are mapped out, they make perfect sense. You make sense. The world makes sense. Give yourself some credit and some time. Keep exploring. Keep mapping.